| David's Home Page | Tuning Pages Menu | Tuning Methods |

5- TO 9-TONE, OCTAVE-REPEATING SCALES

FROM WILSON'S GOLDEN HORAGRAMS OF THE SCALE TREE

David J. Finnamore

Example Page with Explanations

My original goal with these pages was to present the diagrams, tables, and other data in a convenient, one-page format to print and stick in a notebook. It turns out that there are just too many interesting and relevant facets of the Golden horagrams to always fit on a single page. Still, you should be able to print them directly from your browser and build a pretty useful reference document. For 8.5 X 11 inch paper, you'll need to set your margins to 0.5 inches (I guess that would be approx 22 X 28 cm paper with 1.25 cm margins in most of the world). Under Windows, I've had better luck with IE than with Netscape, overall. For some odd reason, Netscape ignores my margin settings and cuts off the right edges of the horagrams.

These conventions are observed on the horagram pages in the menu above:

• I have colored the generator red wherever feasible.
• Ring numbers, usually shown in blue, refer to the number of steps the ring is divided into, not how many rings it is from the center. For example, "Ring 7" does not necessarily mean the 7th ring from the center, it means the ring that contains a total of exactly 7 divisions, or scale degrees.
• In the table to the left of each horagram, the "Ratio" column shows the L:s value in terms of Phi.
• Under each horagram are listed the Mature rings. See the Intro page for details.
• In the horagram itself, the large steps are white, the small ones are gray. I find that helps follow the divisions at a glance.
• I have not plotted as many rings of the horagrams as Wilson did, since I'm almost exclusively interested in octave repeating scales with 5 to 9 tones per octave.
• Only those rings are spelled out in all modes, and the Notes section only refers to intervals found in those rings unless otherwise stated.
• In the Notes section, I show which consonances are closely approximated.
  • By "consonances" I mean complexity (n*d) < 105 - an arbitrary point, but seems to have the most widespread agreement (or at least the fewest objections) on the Tuning List. When I use the term "simple consonances," I mean those that can be reliably accurately tuned using harmonic timbres by tuning out the beats (that is, by ear). Most of those have a complexity less than about 53, but 11:8 and 13:8 are notable exceptions.
  • By "closely approximated" I mean within 7 cents. That's fairly tight but if you open the door much wider you end up with ungainly lists of approximations.
  • At the end of each line, I show in brackets the inversion of the interval, even when its complexity exceeds 105. This, of course, is because both the simple interval and its inversion appear with equal frequency. (Sometimes the simpler of two intervals is in brackets. That just means I discovered the other one in the mode list first.)
• The term "generation(s)" is not inclusive of the 12 o'clock line. For example, for a generator of 100 cents, two generations, also referred to as generation 2, are 200 cents.
• In the table at the bottom of each horagram page
  • The lines in purple are those that exceed 11 generations, and thus do not fit into a 12 note, octave-equivalent tuning table. That's important to me because my most often used synth has that restriction.
  • The "Keys" listed are the keyboard keys the tones fall on in such a tuning table (usually nearest 12 EDO key), not necessarily how they should be spelled in notation.
  • The Tuning Table values are offset to average near zero in the first 11 generations (plus C).
• Each MIDI/mp3 file example is, necessarily, only one small window on the scale and the tuning it exhibits. I don't pretend to have exhausted the resources of these scales; I've barely begun to explore them. But they should give you a taste of some of the sonic properties of each scale. They may not be the greatest music in the world but they have their Moments. [All together now: GROAN!]

There are three characteristics of each ring that I note. Whether it's

1. Gold or alloyed
2. Interlaced or GR
3. Mature or Immature

There are eight possible logical permutations. All eight occur in 5- to 9- number rings of the first 16 Golden horagrams. Since each characteristic is a binary state, a ring may be labled 000, 001, 010, etc. to convey this information more succinctly. I associate 1 with Gold, interlaced, and mature; 0 with alloyed, GR, and immature. For instance, 101 indicates a ring that is Gold - GR - Mature.

I append an "i" to the three digit binary code when the scale is improper.

• Any scale of the Golden horagrams that is not improper is strictly proper. Only when L:s = 2 can a single generator scale be proper-but-not-strictly-proper; and that condition cannot occur with a Noble generator.
• A scale must have more than one small step to be improper.
• Step order and maturity have no bearing on propriety. Provided there is more than one s, propriety is strictly a function of the L:s ratio—if L:s > 2, the scale will be improper. Thus, for any given interlaced Ring, the relationship of the L:s ratio to Phi tells us the propriety of its scale.

  Ratio	Quotient	Propriety
  	1.618	Proper
  (=>1)+	=>2.618	Improper
  3-	1.382	Proper
  1+(1/(2+)	1.276	Proper
  1+(1/(3+)	1.217	Proper
  1+(1/(3-))	1.724	Proper

As far as I can see, all the Golden horagramic scales are CS (constant structure). I can't see any way that an interval could occur more than once in these scales without being composed of the same set of steps.

LEXICON

| INTRO & EXPLANATION | MENUS | KEY & LEXICON | HEAR EXAMPLES |

| David's Home Page | Tuning Pages Menu | Tuning Methods |

Comments and corrections welcome: tuning@elvenminstrel.com